In 2020, 74% of New Zealand companies reported on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors, marking a significant shift in how businesses approach sustainability and ethical practices. This represents a notable increase from 69% in 2017, signaling the growing influence of ESG on corporate strategies and financial outcomes. However, research indicates that the relationship between ESG practices and financial performance is complex and often depends on various factors, including financial slack and sector-specific dynamics.

The landscape of ESG in New Zealand is evolving. Over 8,300 data points collected over a period of five years reveal hidden patterns in ESG performance and its connection to market value, sector-specific trends, and financial outcomes.

The Impact of ESG on Financial Performance

While some studies suggest that ESG disclosures boost market value, the relationship is nuanced. The critical factor here is the level of financial slack, or the availability of resources that companies can use to support sustainability initiatives. Companies with greater financial reserves are more likely to make successful ESG investments and experience higher long-term value creation.

ESG Reporting and Metrics in New Zealand

Since 2020, New Zealand companies have increasingly adopted climate-related disclosure standards, with the implementation of guidelines by the External Reporting Board playing a crucial role. New Zealand-specific ESG standards have also developed rapidly, with organizations such as the New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX) issuing ESG reporting guidance in 2017. As of 2020, 47% of New Zealand firms included sustainability performance in their annual reports, reflecting a growing commitment to transparent ESG practices.

Traditional Financial Metrics vs ESG Indicators

New Zealand’s shift toward incorporating ESG factors into business performance metrics has raised questions about the interplay between traditional financial metrics and ESG indicators. While traditional financial metrics like Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) continue to dominate, ESG metrics are increasingly being used to assess long-term value creation, risk management, and stakeholder engagement.

  • Environmental Metrics: Key performance indicators include carbon emissions, water usage, and biodiversity impacts.
  • Social Factors: These metrics cover employee engagement, labor practices, community relations, and the broader impact of business on society.
  • Governance Elements: Corporate governance practices such as board diversity, executive compensation, and risk management are crucial in understanding how well a company can navigate sustainability challenges.

Development of NZ-Specific ESG Standards

The rise of New Zealand-specific ESG standards has played a critical role in shaping corporate governance practices. The introduction of climate-related disclosure requirements for over 200 entities has standardized ESG reporting, making it easier to evaluate and compare corporate performance across various sectors.

Global ESG Frameworks and Their Impact

The rise of global ESG reporting frameworks, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), has significantly influenced New Zealand’s approach to ESG. With more than 80% of New Zealand’s exports by value going to countries with or planning mandatory climate-related disclosures, local companies are under pressure to align their practices with international standards.

New Zealand businesses increasingly use global frameworks to stay competitive in international markets. This alignment with global standards is not only essential for maintaining trade relationships but also crucial for ensuring long-term sustainability in an interconnected global economy.

Sector-Specific ESG Financial Performance Analysis

Sector-specific analysis reveals distinct patterns in ESG financial performance in New Zealand. Some sectors, particularly utilities and industrials, are at the forefront of ESG integration. These sectors exhibit strong ESG financial performance metrics, with companies like Meridian Energy, Contact Energy, and Mercury leading the charge.

High-Impact Industries:

  • Utilities: The utilities sector has seen the most rapid improvements in ESG integration, with companies such as Manawa Energy and Genesis Energy making significant strides in reducing emissions and adopting climate risk management systems.
  • Industrial and Construction: These industries have seen a 29% increase in ESG reporting, with adoption of the GRI framework up by 34%.

Low-Impact Industries:

  • Consumer Retail and Healthcare: These sectors focus more on social and governance metrics than on environmental factors. Many of the companies in these sectors are subsidiaries of overseas organizations and often face pressure to adhere to international ESG standards.
  • Financial Services: The financial services sector is a key player in ESG integration, with New Zealand’s sustainable finance market now valued at over USD 13.00 billion. Sustainability-linked loans have become a major tool, with a market value of over USD 3.00 billion in 2021.

Cross-Sector ESG Performance Comparison

The correlation between ESG practices and financial performance varies across sectors. For example, companies in sectors with greater financial slack are more likely to invest in ESG initiatives, resulting in better long-term financial outcomes. Companies with strong ESG scores tend to have better market valuations and enjoy greater stakeholder trust.

  • Lifeline Utilities: The utilities sector shows the highest ESG reporting coverage at 94%.
  • Consumer Retail and Industrial Construction: Both sectors have 85% reporting coverage.
  • Agri-food: The agri-food sector has the lowest ESG reporting coverage, with only 72% of companies disclosing ESG practices.

Short-Term vs Long-Term ESG Financial Performance

The relationship between ESG and financial performance is complex, especially in the short term. For instance, data from 2010-2021 suggests that ESG scores have a slight negative correlation with ROA and ROE. However, companies with stronger financial reserves have shown positive correlations with these metrics.

  • Short-Term ROI: Companies with strong ESG practices may initially see lower returns on assets and equity due to the high upfront costs associated with sustainable practices.
  • Long-Term Value Creation: Over time, ESG activities are positively correlated with higher market value, as companies with solid ESG practices tend to experience improved brand loyalty, investor confidence, and risk management.

Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures

Risk-adjusted performance measures reveal that companies with higher ESG scores tend to show better market stability. While ESG scores have a small negative correlation with Tobin’s Q (a measure of market value), they are positively correlated with ROA and ROE.

Companies with sufficient financial reserves are better positioned to balance short-term operational needs with long-term sustainability goals, improving both their ESG performance and financial stability.

Conclusion

The research shows that ESG practices have a growing impact on New Zealand companies’ financial performance, with clear patterns emerging across industries. Companies with financial slack tend to perform better both in terms of ESG integration and financial outcomes. While ESG initiatives may have a complex relationship with short-term profitability, they are increasingly linked to long-term value creation, market stability, and better stakeholder relations. The ability to align local ESG efforts with global frameworks is crucial for New Zealand companies to stay competitive in an interconnected and environmentally-conscious global market.

Published On: February 1st, 2025 / Categories: Finance, Startup, Uncategorized / Tags: /

Stay updated – subscribe to our newsletter

And be the first to hear our latest news.